The impact of Kahramanmaraş (2023) earthquakes: A comparative case study for Adıyaman and Malatya


Dinçer A. E., Dinçer N. N., Tekin Koru A., Yaşar B., Yılmaz Z.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol.110, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 110
  • Publication Date: 2024
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104647
  • Journal Name: International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Keywords: Adıyaman, Economic and environmental impact, Environmental pollution, Kahramanmaraş (2023) earthquakes, Malatya, Small enterprise, Waste management, Waste recycling
  • TED University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

This study examines the effects of two major earthquakes of magnitude 7.7 and 7.6 that struck Kahramanmaraş on February 6th, 2023, followed by a magnitude 6.4 quake in Hatay on February 20th, which caused major damage in 11 Turkish provinces. The study focuses on Adıyaman and Malatya and uses an interdisciplinary approach to analyze the economic and environmental impacts. Primary data sources, including field visits and interviews, reveal clear labor-related challenges in both provinces, characterized by a government-induced labor shortage. In both provinces, physical capital has been severely damaged, particularly affecting small businesses, historic bazaars, and old industrial areas. The impact on businesses varies by size and location, with Adıyaman suffering more severe setbacks than other cities. The shortage of skilled labor related to the earthquake damage affects the quality of production, which can have a serious economic impact. Transportation disruptions continue to hamper supply chains and affect companies' ability to meet their export commitments. The environmental consequences, particularly the large amount of debris, pose a major challenge. The lack of a comprehensive disaster waste plan at the central government level leads to inadequate waste management. The study recommends sorting the debris at temporary sites to obtain reusable items while paying attention to the sustainability and transparency of debris management processes. In summary, this comparative case study highlights the need for tailored approaches to address the different impacts in the 11 provinces. A one-size-fits-all solution is insufficient and an individual needs assessment is needed for each province in order to implement targeted economic and environmental recovery measures.