Engineering attributes of ground motions from February 2023 Türkiye earthquake sequence


Buckreis T. E., Pretell R., Sandikkaya M. A., Kale Ö., ASKAN GÜNDOĞAN A., Brandenberg S. J., ...Daha Fazla

Earthquake Spectra, cilt.40, sa.4, ss.2268-2284, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 40 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1177/87552930241259024
  • Dergi Adı: Earthquake Spectra
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, PASCAL, Aerospace Database, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, Geobase, Metadex, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.2268-2284
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: earthquake, ground motion, path effects, spatial correlation, Türkiye
  • TED Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The 2023 Türkiye earthquake sequence includes the 6 February M7.81 mainshock followed approximately 9 h later by an M7.74 event, and many smaller aftershocks including M6.81 and M6.37 events on 6 and 20 February, respectively. These events occurred in a region near the plate boundary of the East Anatolian Fault, in the proximity of which numerous ground motion recording stations had been installed north of the Türkiye–Syria border. As a result, the events were well recorded both near the fault and at rupture distances up to 582 km. We describe the available recordings and component-specific data processing performed with the aim of optimizing usable bandwidth. The resulting database includes 337, 365, 284, and 229 usable three-component recordings from the M7.81, M7.74, M6.81, and M6.37 events, respectively. We also present source, path, and site metadata that were compiled according to uniform protocols. Comparisons to a global ground motion model (GMM) for active tectonic regions and a local, Türkiye-specific model demonstrate the existence of complex path effects that result in relatively poor fits between the GMMs and observed data at large distances (generally RJB > 200 km). Under-predictions at some stations may be influenced by directivity and/or basin effects that affect the ground motions but that are not accounted for directly in the GMMs. We present analysis of spatial variability of several intensity measures. The residual maps produced from these analyses demonstrate that the global GMM overpredicts on the Anatolian block and underpredicts on the Arabian block, which is suggestive of distinct crustal attenuation features.