Investigating the perceived relationship quality among LGBTQ+ individuals in terms of various variables within the minority stress model


Barburoğlu Y., Üçok S. B., Köksal E. Ç., Gandhi Y., Lannutti P., Randall A. K.

23rd International Counseling and Guidance Congress, İstanbul, Türkiye, 14 - 17 Haziran 2022, ss.421-422

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: İstanbul
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.421-422
  • TED Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Investigating the Perceived Relationship Quality among LGBTQ+ Individuals in Terms of Various Variables within the Minority Stress Model Aim: This study was based on the Minority Stress Model, and accordingly, the perceived relationship quality of LGBTQ+ people was examined in terms of distal and proximal stress factors and protective factors. According to the Minority Stress Model, distal stressors are objective stressful events (prejudice and discrimination-based violence) based on individuals' sexual minority identities, while proximal stressors are the subjective interpretations of external stressful events (e.g., expectations of rejection, concealment, and internalized homophobia/transphobia). Protective factors are variables that reduce or eliminate the negative effects of the mentioned stress factors on mental health and are related to coping or resilience. Accordingly, distal stress based on prejudice and discrimination and proximal stress, which are subjective interpretations of these stress factors, are negatively related to mental health, while protective factors such as social support are positively related to mental health. In this context, distal and proximal gay-related stress, perceived social support, and perceived relationship quality are the variables of the Minority Stress Model discussed in this study. In addition, variables such as being involved in one (monoamory) or more than one romantic relationship at the same time (polyamory), cohabitation, and relationship duration were also included in the study as relational variables. When the studies on perceived relationship quality are examined, it is noteworthy that these studies are predominantly based on heterosexual relationships. To the knowledge of the researchers, how the factors specific to LGBTQ+ people, such as distal and proximal gay-related stress, are associated with perceived relationship quality is limited in the literature, while it has also not been studied in the national literature yet. In this context, the aim of this study is to explore the perceived relationship quality of LGBTQ+ people based on the relational variables and the Minority Stress Model framework. Method: The study sample consisted of 121 participants who are at least 18 years old, define themselves as LGBTQ+, have been in a relationship for at least three months, and live in Turkey. Participants were reached online through purposive sampling. The data collection tools of this study are Demographic Form, Measures of Gay-Related Stress, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and Perceived Relationship Quality Scale. Findings: In order to test the research question, Pearson correlation and Mann-Whitney U analyses were run via SPSS 24 software. The findings showed that the perceived relationship quality was significantly lower in people who were in more than one romantic relationship at the same time and that it was negatively correlated with proximal gay-related stress. In addition, the findings depicted that perceived relationship quality has a positive and significant relationship with perceived social support from a friend and perceived social support from a significant other. On the other hand, perceived relationship quality demonstrated no significant relationship with cohabitation, duration of the relationship, distal gay-related stress, and perceived social support from the family. 422 Conclusion: This research is one of the few studies in the literature that examines the perceived relationship quality by taking into account the factors specific to LGBTQ+ people, such as discrimination, stigma, and homosexuality-related internal stress, as well as the relational variables and perceived social support. To the knowledge of the researchers, it is also the first study in this scope in the national literature. The relationship between the perceived relationship quality of LGBTQ+ adults living in Turkey, monoamory or polyamory, proximal gay-related stress, perceived social support from friends, and perceived social support from a significant other is discussed within the framework of minority stress model literature, highlighting the roles of psychological counselors such as cultural sensitivity and advocacy. Keywords: perceived relationship quality, minority stress model, gay-related stress, perceived social support, LGBTQ+