Copy For Citation
Einwohner R. L., Kelly-Thompson K., Sinclair-Chapman V., Tormos-Aponte F., Weldon S. L., Wright J. M., ...More
SOCIAL POLITICS, vol.28, no.3, pp.704-729, 2021 (SSCI)
-
Publication Type:
Article / Article
-
Volume:
28
Issue:
3
-
Publication Date:
2021
-
Doi Number:
10.1093/sp/jxz052
-
Journal Name:
SOCIAL POLITICS
-
Journal Indexes:
Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, IBZ Online, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, Periodicals Index Online, American History and Life, Educational research abstracts (ERA), Gender Studies Database, Historical Abstracts, Index Islamicus, PAIS International, Political Science Complete, Public Affairs Index, Social services abstracts, Sociological abstracts, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
-
Page Numbers:
pp.704-729
-
TED University Affiliated:
No
Abstract
While solidarity lies at the heart of collective action, it is not easily achieved. Social movements are characterized not only by difference within activist ranks but also by power asymmetries that reflect broader domination and distrust. The concept of intersectional solidarity is central to contemporary social justice movements' efforts to negotiate these divisions, but how can it be achieved? To answer this question, we offer some guidelines for enacting intersectional solidarity, drawing on a theoretically grounded examination of three contemporary social movements in the United States and abroad (Occupy, Gezi Park, and the Women's March).