Contesting the norm contester: responses to Turkey’s withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention


Özdemir Sarıgil B., BODUR ÜN M.

Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 2025 (SSCI, Scopus) identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Publication Date: 2025
  • Doi Number: 10.1080/14683857.2025.2514354
  • Journal Name: Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
  • Journal Indexes: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, IBZ Online, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, Historical Abstracts, Humanities Abstracts, Index Islamicus, Political Science Complete, Public Affairs Index, Sociological abstracts, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
  • Keywords: Council of Europe, Istanbul Convention, Norm contestation, norm robustness, third-party responses to norm contestation, Turkey
  • TED University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

This article contributes to research on norm contestation by examining the types of responses to norm contesters that might preserve, strengthen or undermine norm robustness. It focuses on the Council of Europe (CoE) and its member states’ reactions to Turkey’s withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention and its validity contestation of gender equality norms. Using a typology of responses to norm contestation (i.e. containment, alignment, no response), the study analyzes an original dataset of online diplomatic communications released during the three-month official withdrawal process. The findings show that the CoE and its members did not align with Turkey, either adopting a non-response strategy or actively containing Turkey’s position, thereby reinforcing their commitment to the Convention and gender equality norms. The analysis reveals that even the effects of validity norm contestations, as in the Turkish case, can be mitigated through containment responses, preserving and even reinforcing the norms’ robustness.