The Insoluble Antinomy of Truths: Mapping a Literary Theory in Alain Badiou’s Philosophy
- Publication Type: Article / Article
- Publication Date: 2026
- Doi Number: 10.1515/sats-2025-0008
- Journal Name: SATS
- Journal Indexes: Scopus, IBZ Online, Philosopher's Index, Philosopher's Index full-text
- Keywords: art, event, interpretation, knowledge, truth
- TED University Affiliated: Yes
Abstract
This study argues that there is an internal inconsistency in Badiou’s treatment of art, particularly in how he applies his ontological investigations to literary works. This inconsistency complicates the use of a literary theory derived from his philosophy. By examining Badiou’s encounters with specific literary works, we reveal two distinct yet unexamined descriptions of artistic truth that coexist within his writings. Understanding these dualities allows us to explore how Badiou’s concept of ‘truths’ transcends both temporal and local knowledge systems – such as postmodernism – which may be influential for a time but ultimately fade. The very inconsistency within Badiou’s framework is a strength, as it opens the possibility for two distinct ontological modes of reading literature. This approach broadens the potential for declaring universal ‘truths’ that are both ‘singular’ and ‘immanent’, while applicable to both an infinite “configuration” of literary works and a finite individual work as “pertinent units” of literary criticism. This inconsistency not only helps to challenge and blur the clichéd boundaries between literary schools and epochs but also infuses literary theory – drawn from Badiou’s philosophy – with an anti-identitarian, trans-linguistic, trans-historical, and trans-topological resonance.